Ne-e-e-e-e-erd!

(Well, use­ful for some­one of my ilk, at any rate.)

Today I learned that there’s an Open Exo­plan­et Cat­a­logue online, with all the cur­rent­ly-known extra­so­lar plan­ets list­ed. This will come in handy, I’m sure, when writ­ing sci­ence fiction.

It lives at the inter­sec­tion of astron­o­my and Open Source:

The Open Exo­plan­et Cat­a­logue is a cat­a­logue of all dis­cov­ered extra-solar plan­ets. It is a new kind of astro­nom­i­cal data­base, based on small text files and a dis­trib­uted ver­sion con­trol sys­tem. It is decen­tral­ized and com­plete­ly open. Con­tri­bu­tion and cor­rec­tions are wel­come. The Open Exo­plan­et Cat­a­logue is fur­ther­more the only cat­a­logue that can cor­rect­ly rep­re­sent the orbital struc­ture of plan­ets in arbi­trary bina­ry, triple and quadru­ple star sys­tems as well as orphan planets. 

It even has, as they put it, “an xkcd-style bub­ble chart” of the planets.

found via this io9 story

Musi­cal pair­ing: “We Are Not Alone”, Voivod

There’s an arti­cle on io9.com ask­ing whether The Phan­tom Men­ace has bet­ter world-build­ing than Star Wars ¹. The debate, in my mind, boils down to this: Show vs. Tell. Every book, every arti­cle on writ­ing that I’ve ever read stressed one core rule for expo­si­tion, and by exten­sion for world-build­ing ²: Show, don’t tell.

Char­lie Jane Anders, the author of the io9 piece, comes down in favour of Show, don’t tell. She shares my view that the orig­i­nal film had far bet­ter world-build­ing than the first pre­quel, because Star Wars showed you the world you were in, with lit­tle pieces in vir­tu­al­ly every scene, where­as The Phan­tom Men­ace told you most of what you “need­ed” to know, either in the open­ing crawl or in “as you know, Bob” ³-style dia­logue.

I much pre­fer my sci­ence fic­tion — actu­al­ly, any fic­tion — to stay clear of too many giant expos­i­to­ry infor­ma­tion dumps. (One series that kind of annoyed me for this rea­son was the Hype­r­i­on Can­tos by Dan Sim­mons — the sto­ry was flow­ing along pret­ty well, and then the final book fea­tured a lengthy chap­ter that was essen­tial­ly one char­ac­ter explain­ing the sto­ry to a group of oth­er (and, by proxy, the read­er). It stopped every hint of for­ward momen­tum, and it let me down, I feel, as a reader.)

Here’s a list of nov­els & series that I think did their world-build­ing right:

• Frank Her­bert’s amaz­ing Dune saga ⁴
• Michael Swan­wick­’s Sta­tions of the Tide
• William Gib­son’s nov­els — I have a soft place in my heart for the Sprawl tril­o­gy, especially
• Joe Halde­man’s For­ev­er War
• Stephen King’s Dark Tow­er saga — the open­ing line spoke vol­umes: “The man in black fled across the desert, and the gun­slinger followed.”

Look­ing at my list, it seems that I like sto­ries that dump me into the sto­ry in the mid­dle — in media res, as they say — and then let me build the world in my own mind as I read.

What about you? Where have you seen/read excep­tion­al world-building?