Books
Review: Kelly Link’s Get in Trouble
Get in Trouble by Kelly Link
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
Kelly Link writes stories like no other. Every one is different, but they’re all linked by a curious magic and a sense that you have no idea where you’re going, but it’s going to be worth the ride.
OK, that’s the short version. I’ve had time to digest, and so here’s a bit more.
I suspect that Ms. Link is a pantser, like, say, Stephen King. (Edit: She evidently is not.) She invents fully-formed characters, then sets them loose in settings as varied as the hollers of the southern US, a sleeper ship on its way to Proxima Centauri, a hotel hosting two conventions, and an island wedding. Then she sits back—in a manner of speaking—to see what happens.
The opening story, “The Summer People”, was a beautiful thing. I’ve been working my way through the last season of Justified, and I kept imagining actors from the show in the roles of the two girls in the story.
“Secret Identity” is a long email written by a young woman (almost sixteen!) who almost got involved with a man nearly twenty years her senior. It takes place at a hotel hosting two conventions, one for dentists, the others for superheroes.
“The Lesson” felt tragic and beautiful and creepy.
“Two Houses”, a collection of ghost stories on board a spaceship, was every bit as spooky and spacesuit‑y as you think, and it had echoes, as you’d expect, of Ray Bradbury.
Every story in this collection is worth your time. Every story dumps you into a situation that you don’t understand, that you can’t yet understand, and then feeds you the information you need to make sense of what’s happening. (It took me quite some time, for example, to decide if the superhero convention was a cosplay convention, or a gathering of honest-to-God superbeings. I’ll let you read it so you can decide for yourself.) Every story is a layered treasure, unfolding slowly or quickly, till the gem at its heart is revealed.
More jetpack envy?
From Daniel Handler’s review of Patrick deWitt’s latest novel, Undermajordomo Minor, which I am currently reading and enjoying:
It is said, for instance, that Margaret Atwood does a take on science fiction and therefore is a literary writer instead of a science fiction writer, and then we wonder why there are so few science fiction writers who write as well as Margaret Atwood, while the science fiction writers glare at us and order another round. This is bad. “The Handmaid’s Tale” is science fiction and should not be disqualified as such on the grounds that it has good sentences and makes you think, as does the work of Patrick deWitt. Therefore, “Undermajordomo Minor” is a terrific piece of genre writing, and that’s that.
I’m a little irritated—perhaps unjustly so—at the suggestion that science fiction (and other genres) can never contain “good sentences” or “[make] you think”. I just can’t quite decide if Handler shares my irritation; I’d like to think that he does. In either case, I’d point those that may hold that opinion at works like Michael Swanwick’s Stations of the Tide or Gene Wolfe’s The Book of the New Sun, to name two examples.
PS: If you haven’t read anything by deWitt, I highly recommend The Sisters Brothers and (even though I’m not yet done reading it) Undermajordomo Minor.
Library haul
Went down to the public library tonight, since my copies of Neil Gaiman’s The Ocean at the End of the Lane and John Scalzi’s The End of All Things were due back.
(Reviews: The Ocean at the End of the Lane was a spooky coming-of-age/memoir tale from a master of eerie fantasy; The End of All Things further solidified my view of John Scalzi as my generation’s Joe Haldeman (though it might have been smart of me to read The Human Division first).)
So I went in without any plans as to what I wanted to check out. I did check the catalogue for the status of Emily St. John Mandel’s Station Eleven, which has been checked out every time I’ve gone looking for it. Tonight was no exception. One day (shakes fist at the sky).
But by and large I had no agenda. I checked the New Releases section, and snagged Chuck Wendig’s Aftermath. Then I wandered over to the SF/F section, which is where I usually end up. Grabbed another volume there — a four-novel omnibus of Philip K. Dick novels, which either a) has fantastically small print or b) serves as a reminder of how short novels could be back in the 60s. And then I took a gander at the graphic novels, where I grabbed my third and final volume: Scott McCloud’s Sculptor.
I’m looking forward to all of these. I just can’t decide which should be first.
Help?
The Once and Future King
For many years I fobbed it off, since it was fantasy, and I was for a long time a snob about such things. (Science fiction was good; fantasy was not. Thanks, Sir Terry Pratchett, for finally showing me the error of my ways.)
For years I’ve meant to read it, but never got around to it.
Now I’m reading it, and I’m wondering two things:
- Why didn’t I read this years ago?
-
Why did no one ever tell me how funny it is?
Current read: The Once and Future King by T. H. White.
(Well, so far it’s funny, but I’m only getting near the end of Book I (of IV).)
A lesson in a line
Reading in bed last night, I came across this gem:
It is always a temptation to say that such feelings are indescribable, though they seldom are.
— Gene Wolfe, The Sword of the Lictor (vol. III in the Book of the New Sun tetralogy), chapter XXII: “The Skirts of the Mountain”
In a single line the author eviscerated a fairly common trope in SF/F writing. Now and forever after, when I read a sentence stating that X was indescribable or referring to an indescribable colour or an indescribable feeling, I’m going to wonder: Is it really indescribable, though, or is the author simply not interested enough to describe it to me?
I’ve taken the lesson to heart, though: from here on out I’ll be doing my best to excise indescribable from my own lexicon.
Robert Sawyer on SF
“Canadian ‘literature’ is decided by a small cabal of academics who have served us poorly as gatekeepers.”
via Mahoney: Science fiction: the ‘literature of big ideas’.
See also:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tomgauld/7266861798/
Review: Claire DeWitt and the City of the Dead

I can’t remember the second-last book that I read in a single day, but I can tell you what the last one was: Sara Gran’s Claire DeWitt and the City of the Dead.
Thanks, Doug, for suggesting that I check out this author.
Claire DeWitt is hired by Leon to find out what happened to his uncle Vic, the DA in New Orleans. Vic has vanished; Leon isn’t sure if he’s alive or dead, though he suspects the latter. Leon hired Claire because she’s the best, but she’s far from ordinary. A disciple of a little-known French investigator, Jacques Silette, who wrote a single book on his investigative principles, Détection, back in the ’50s. Silette’s style of detective work is only partly about finding out who done it; it’s more about solving the mystery of one’s own self. Everyone already knows the solution, he claims; it’s just that very, very few are willing to accept and admit the truth.
Claire DeWitt reminded me of both Sherlock Holmes and his latter-day avatar Darryl Zero1. She has the uncanny ability to construct entire truths out of the thinnest of clues; after learning that one young man’s sister used to call him Nee-Nee, she not only divined his name (Nicholas) but also his place of birth, the number of siblings he had, and the ice-cream parlour where he’d most recently worked. Like Holmes, too, she has a fondness for the drugs: booze, weed, various mushroom-based compounds — heck, at least once, she smoked a joint laced with embalming fluid. (No kidding.)
But Claire is a completely original creation. She’s a fatalist, a mental case, a perhaps-murderer. She’s a deeply flawed character, an anti-hero who grew up in a decaying mansion, a blood-sister who gave up looking for her best friend when she vanished. Her mentor was murdered in a random act of senseless violence.
The setting, too, is key. The novel is set in New Orleans, post-Katrina, and the city itself is a character: it’s a wounded beast, perhaps mortally so, trying desperately to recover, but it’s not clear if it can recover, or even if it’s worth recovering. It’s not a city for happy endings, a fact that is repeated several times, by different people. It’s a warning to the reader, too: This doesn’t end well. (Does it end well? You’ll have to read it to find out.)
The story itself is tautly plotted, and moves along at a great clip. Claire’s leaps of logic are (mostly) explained to the reader, and they (mostly) make sense in the end. The story kept me immersed, completely — like I said, I read it in a day, something I haven’t done in a long time.
I loved this book, and I eagerly look forward to reading its sequel, Claire DeWitt and the Bohemian Highway.
Get it from:
McNally Robinson
| Chapters/Indigo
| Amazon
- If you haven’t seen Zero Effect, hunt it down. ↩
The Martian Chronicles
The first time I read Ray Bradbury’s The Martian Chronicles, I was 16 or 17, in high school. All the dates were in the future, then.
The second time I read The Martian Chronicles, I was 40, Ray Bradbury had recently died, and only the last three chapters were in the “future”.
I’ve grown a lot in those twenty+ years. I’ve matured as a reader and as a writer. I’ve actually had one of my short stories compared to Bradbury’s writing, which I thought was an immense honour.
When I was a teenager — heck, into my thirties — I was a science fiction snob. I sniffed in disdain at fantasy (excepting, of course, Terry Pratchett’s oeuvre and the then-ongoing Dark Tower saga from Stephen King — yes, I was a hypocrite.) The Martian Chronicles was the first thing I read that melded science fiction and fantasy — not the swords-and-sorcery type that I was so dead-set against back then (and still am not a huge fan of), but the subtler fantasy that allows a rocket launch to turn winter into flowers-blooming summer for a day. The fantasy that has a traveler on a lonely road meeting up with a Martian millennia dead, a Martian that views him as the ghost instead. A Johnny-Appleseed figure that plants oaks that grow large enough to provide shade in a single night.
There’s a poetry to Bradbury’s writing, the same sort of poetry that I find in William Gibson’s writing, though in a very different way. They both have a talent for finding le mot juste, that elusive turn of phrase that makes everything clear in the reader’s mind.
If you haven’t read The Martian Chronicles, go, do so.



